When Kim Il-Jong recently visited Moscow on a surreal train journey, he proudly informed Vladimir Putin he was travelling in the armoured train given to his father as a present by Stalin. As analysts of the regime agree, this merely illustrates the extraordinary, reverential detail with which Kim and his founding father Kim Il-Sung have maintained a complete Stalinist state into the 21st century: In both North Korea and Iraq, the absolute political control of a tiny oligarchy, the propaganda state, economic centralisation, the interlocking labyrinth of security forces, and the preposterous cult of personality are self-consciously Stalinist Stalin, like Saddam, survived in power because he so terrorised his people that however great his blunders, there was no opposition left alive.
Eight years later, this promise has yet to be fulfilled, and even with the help of many countries globally, the threat of terrorism is still evident more then ever, which questions whether the global war on terror is succeeding.
Moreover, to entirely grasp the subject, one must be familiar with the definition of terrorism and it can be defined as an act of violence or threatened violence intended to spread panic in a society, and to bring about political change. Terrorists do not necessarily live in their native states, they also migrate to neighboring countries, and countries abroad and often go undetected.
The logistics and man power it takes to combat terrorism is immense, and it seems more evident that the global war on terrorism is not succeeding due to essentially three factors. Second, international support for the global war on terrorism is decreasing.
Third, terrorism has been on the constant increase since September 11, Although the invasion was intended to disarm Iraq from any weapons of mass destruction, it was also aimed at uncovering and eliminating any terrorist organizations within the country since several United States officials accused Hussein of harboring and supporting al-Qaeda, the terrorist Thesis on war on terror responsible for the September 11 attacks.
However, some argue that the occupation of Iraq was essential in the global fight against terrorism. Former President George W. Bush stated that if the United States and the United Kingdom had not invaded Iraq, terrorists would not be idle.
By fighting these terrorists in Iraq, Americans in uniform are defeating a direct threat to the American people. Invading Iraq may have deterred it from becoming a threat to the American people and the people of the world at the time, but overtime what has been evident is the increase in religious extremist and terrorist activity within Iraq and surrounding areas.
The global war on terrorism had begun in where the coalition of the willing was created by George W. Bush, which were nations who supported the U.
The coalition of the willing was made up of forty-nine members, most notably, England, France, Germany, Japan, India and Russia. Out of the forty-nine members, only four supplied troops to the invasion force United Kingdom, Australia, Poland and Denmark.
All forty-nine countries part of the coalition of the willing had strong support for the war on terrorism, but as ofsupport had decreased. Moreover, less than half of the United Kingdom and Germany supported the war, only forty-three percent of France were in favor and a very low twenty-six percent of Japanese people supported the war.
This decline in support was substantial, and according to a Pew Research Centre survey, most of the countries surveyed regarding the U.
In fact, when surveyed regarding the war on Iraq, the majority of people living within the countries belonging to the coalition of the willing believed that the war in Iraq made the world more dangerous. Such evidence suggests that these are the reasons why international support for the war on terrorism decreased.
Furthermore, the Pew Research Centre discovered through polls that most countries within the coalition of the willing believed that the true purpose of the U.
S-led war on terrorism was to control the oil within the Middle East and to dominate the world. An additional underlying factor that can be contributing to this decrease of support for the United States may be the misunderstanding and misinterpretation between countries on the definition of terrorism.
In his address to the nation, George W. Nevertheless, some may not disagree that there is decreasing support for the U. Issues of prisoner abuse arose, which were then made public throughout the world and left a stain on the United States effort to fight terrorism.
The images and stories coming out of Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq revealed that prisoners were abused, tortured and humiliated by American soldiers.
There was also the question whether the United States invasion of Iraq was justified and acceptable under international law. Therefore, the fact that it was a war made out of choice and not necessity could be the factor that renders the war unjustified.
These arguments are relevant when one looks at the reasons for the decrease in support for the U. Countries are essentially more concerned about their own security than whether or not a certain state is following international laws or not.
When a large amount of nations across the world united and supported each other in the global war on terrorism, their intentions were to decrease the amount of terrorism in the world and to make their own countries more safe and secure for their citizens.
The war on terrorism, controlled by the United States, was intended to disrupt the terrorist activities of the international system of terrorist organizations composed of a number of groups who were run under the order of al-Qaeda. However, what was evident after the first year of the war on terrorism was not a decrease, but an increase in the amount of attacks brought upon civilians by terrorists.
Bush had announced the global war on terrorism, the number of international terrorist attacks had consistently increased.
Inthere were 11, terrorist attacks worldwide. This amount grew in to its highest amount where 14, terrorist attacks had taken place and remained relatively the same in Since the war on terrorism was intended to decrease the amount of international terrorist attacks, the statistics showing a constant rate in increase of the number of attacks does not depict a war that is being won.
However, it may be argued that the global war on terrorism is succeeding since it is preventing potentially large terrorist attacks from occurring and since statistics generally represent the war as unsuccessful. This is evident in statistics where no major terrorist attacks occurred in Europe, and the total number of attacks in India, Indonesia and Pakistan declined.
Some may argue that statistics are irrelevant when one tries to determine whether the global war on terrorism is succeeding. There can be a substantial amount of data displaying the number of attacks that have taken place, but when it comes to determining how many terrorist attacks were prevented, it is much more difficult to conclude.I.
Introduction. Native Americans long dominated the vastness of the American West.
Linked culturally and geographically by trade, travel, and warfare, various indigenous groups controlled most of the continent west of the Mississippi River deep into the nineteenth century. The thesis statement evaluation and analysis is an important task about a dissertation thesis writing process.
Normally the first step of the evaluation is is the thesis is . UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGOFacing the Earth, Grounding the Image: Representations of the Aztec Tlaltecuhtli A thesis s.
Calling Shaul Eisenberg. October 25, "By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Make War" is the official motto of the Mossad. "Tahvulot" in Hebrew is better translated as "with tricks" than as "way of deception", and is deeply related to the modern word for "terrorism.".
"An End to Evil charts the agenda for what's next in the war on terrorism, as articulated by David Frum, former presidential speechwriter and bestselling author of "The Right Man, and Richard Perle, former assistant secretary of defense and one of the most influential foreign-policy leaders in Washington.
That day “the United States government announced its intentions to begin a War on Terrorism (or War on Terror), a protracted struggle against terrorists and states that aid terrorists” (WAR ON TERROR). Jul 02, · It will posit that the ‘war on terror’ is not in fact a ‘clash of civilizations’, but a conflict between two powerful groups of elites, for whom the ‘clash of . Due to “War on Terror”, the countries’ buildings are destroyed and it prevents the citizens from enjoying government benefit. More than a fifth of Syria’s schools have been destroyed or made unusable in more than two years of conflict, jeopardizing the education of million young people.
The thesis is the controlling idea around which you construct the rest of your paper. In a history paper, the thesis generally explains why or how something happened. Every word .